Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡¾Æ ¹× ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® ÁöÁö °íÁ¤¼º ±¹¼ÒÀ§Ä¡ÀÇ ºñ°íÁ¤¼º ¿¬°áºÎÀÇ À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ýÀû ÀÀ·ÂºÐ¼®

A finite element stress analysis of tooth and implant supported fixed partial denture according to the location of non-rigid connector

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1995³â 33±Ç 4È£ p.807 ~ 823
¾Èº´ÁÖ, Ȳ¿µÇÊ, °è±â¼º, Á¶±ÔÁ¾,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾Èº´ÁÖ ( Ahn Byoung-Ju ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Ȳ¿µÇÊ ( Hwang Young-Phil ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
°è±â¼º ( Kay Kee-Sung ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶±ÔÁ¾ ( Cho Kyu-Zong ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ±â°è°øÇаú

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to analyze the stress distribution and the displacement happened to the abutment, the prosthesis, and the surrounding structure according to the location of the non-rigid connector, that is, the keyway in the distal of canine and the mesial of the implant in the three unit fixed partial denture. Two-dimensional finite element model was constructed and analyzed for the stress distribution and the displacement using software ABAQUS (Ver 5.2 Hibbitt, Karisson & Sorenson, Inc.,1992). After finishing the finite element model, the distribution load of 15kg was applied simultaneously to the all cusp tips of the prosthesis and the concentration load of 10kg was applied respectively at the each cusp tip of the prosthesis. @ES The following results were obtained: @EN 1. The amount of displacement of the implant was greater in case of the non-rigid connection than the rigid connection, and the more favorable displacement was shown in case of the IKb than the IKa. 2. Without regard to the connection method, the stress represented at the surrounding bone was similar, and the more favorable stress distribution was shown in case of IKb. 3. The maximum stress was concentrated at the fastening screw and the neck of implant in all experimental groups, and their stress magnitudes were in the order of IKb, IR, and IKa.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed